Ad spend
$28,130.74
Total spent, 1 May – 25 Jul 2025.
Case study · Online store · Meta ads
From 1 May to 25 July 2025, an online store spent $28,130.74 on Facebook and Instagram ads. Meta Ads Manager tracked 3,717 website purchases worth $150,527.84, an average ROAS of 5.35. The account ran in US dollars.
Case study · Figures read directly from Meta Ads Manager · Client name withheld
$28,130.74 spent · $150,527.84 tracked sales · 5.35 ROAS
The numbers
Ad spend
Total spent, 1 May – 25 Jul 2025.
Tracked sales
Purchase value tracked by Meta.
Website purchases
In under three months.
Average ROAS
Tracked sales divided by ad spend.
Platform-attributed purchase value is not profit. These examples are not a guarantee of future results.
The client
An online store selling through its own website, with the ad account set in US dollars. The client’s name is withheld and the screenshot has no client or campaign names in it.
How we worked
Website purchases and their value reported back to Meta.
Several ads ran side by side, each judged on tracked sales.
More budget went to ads with a strong return; weaker ones were cut.
The account was judged on total sales and ROAS, not one lucky ad.
Read it honestly
Tracked purchase value is not profit, and Meta’s attribution is not perfect. In the screenshot, single ads range from a ROAS of 4.13 to 9.95, which is why testing several ads matters.
More results
A few straight answers
$28,130.74 from 1 May to 25 July 2025.
3,717 website purchases worth $150,527.84.
An average of 5.35, as shown in Ads Manager.
The ad account was set up in US dollars, so the figures are shown exactly as they appear.
A useful first step
Send us your Ads Manager results and margins. We’ll explain what the numbers mean for profit. Initial review at no charge.